Sock Summit knitting: Socks, of course!

posted in: Knitting, Travel | 18

In celebration of Sock Summit 2009, Priscilla Gibson-Roberts put together instructions for some socks she made that evoke "How did you make those???" questions whenever she wears them. We sold a bunch of patterns at the Summit and expect to have them available for sale through the Nomad Press website in early September. They are printed pattern booklets (because we haven't had time yet to determine the best way for us to sell downloadable PDFs, and we are still tactile enough to love print, even as we do more work electronically). I'll talk about that more later, but for now here's the cover with photos of Priscilla's socks:

Tabi-socks-front-cover

Priscilla knitted both pairs (rainbow and random) with leftovers from the Bazaar Socks she designed that appeared in Interweave Knits and are now available as a downloadable PDF from Interweave's store (they have an actual staff to figure out the downloadable PDF thing). The yarns are Brown Sheep's Cotton Fine (80% cotton and 20% wool), which comes in a miraculous array of colors. Priscilla worked her socks at 10 stitches to the inch (40 stitches/10cm).

The written pattern talks about substituting other yarns. Not many appropriate lines of fiber come in enough solid colors to get the effect Priscilla did. (For dyers, this is a great project to use up samples. For knitters of commercial yarn, it can be adapted to use any array of leftovers that is moderately harmonious.)

I decided to knit a pair in Blue Moon's Sock Candy (96% cotton and 4% Elite elastic), which is offered in an array of nice colors. I began working before Sock Summit, worked through Sock Summit, and am knitting after Sock Summit. This design is very entertaining to knit and progress is quick when I'm actually knitting (instead of doing other things, like teaching), and I'll have more photos later.

Picking the right gauge

Socks knitted at a relatively tight (although not board-like) gauge last longer. Sock Candy is slightly heavier than Cotton Fine. I cranked the needle size down from the recommendation for the yarn (spec'd for 7-8 stitches to the inch) and worked at 8.5 stitches to the inch (34 stitches/10cm). I loved the weight and feel of the fabric, but I ran into two problems. First, at that gauge the tips of my needles kept separating the plies of the yarn. Also, working the stitches that firmly ended up being hard on my hands—it was hard to pull the new loops through the old ones.

During the Summit, I made a lot of progress on the sock at that gauge, shown at left in the photo below, but after the festivities ended I decided to start over on one-size-larger needles. The gauge is now 8.25 stitches to the inch (33/10cm), and the two sock-portions shown on the right are the new pair. I'll unravel the first, tighter, sock after I replicate large portions of its color sequence, which I like, on the second sock of the "real" pair. On the first sock at the new gauge, I shifted colors around, which is one of the ways I keep myself from being bothered by reknitting things: I make them differently on the rework.

IMG_2998-3socks

When the socks are on feet, the bands stretch out and they look like the socks in the photo on the pattern, even though they're worked in a different yarn at a different gauge. (I'll have more pictures later, when they're closer to done. That turquoise stitch marker shows me which is the little-toe edge of the four-toes section of the sock.)

What a difference a quarter-stitch (per inch) makes!

That shift in needle sizes and therefore gauge made all the difference in the world for my knitting pleasure. I'm no longer splitting plies and it's easy to form the stitches. The fabric is noticeably less firm—even with that tiny adjustment!—but should still be sturdy enough (even for me).

I think those facts are rather stunning. A QUARTER-STITCH per inch makes a night-and-day difference in all aspects of this knitting project. With a coarser yarn, a quarter-stitch wouldn't have that impact—but a half-stitch could. With sock yarn, a quarter-stitch is all it takes.

What effect does my shift have on sock size? At the original gauge of 8.5 stitches to the inch, the sock's circumference was 8.47 inches (21.5cm). That works for me. The sock, which I could try on as I went, fit snugly and would have worked fine.

When I changed needle sizes, I stayed with the same number of stitches (72). At 8.25 stitches to the inch, the circumference is 8.72 inches (22.1cm). The result is slightly looser—enough easier to get on that I like it better and think that I will wear this version a lot more often than I would have worn the previous version.

In this photo, the new (larger, 8.25 gauge) sock is underneath and the old (smaller. 8.5 gauge) sock is on top, to show the very slight difference in circumference.

IMG_3000-sock-comp

Socks are very flexible projects, but small things can matter nonetheless.

__

Note on needle sizes: I work loosely, because it's easier on my hands. With the Sock Candy, I was on size 1.5mm (000) needles and changed to 1.75mm (00). A "normal" knitter would have been on 2mm (0) and moved to 2.25mm (1).

Facebooktwitterrss

18 Responses

  1. Fabulous socks! Priscilla’s a designing genius, and you are an amazing fiber whisperer. Would that I had your patience and meticulousness–I think I’ll stick to darning socks for now!

  2. You’re the one who’s such a good cook, right?

  3. Darning is an art.

    Odd, I don’t think of it as patience but as curiosity about how the thing will turn out.

    Yes, Priscilla’s a designing genius. She doesn’t see herself that way, but it’s unquestionable from the outside.

  4. Your knitting is an art, as is your spinning and your knowledge of the fiber–your fingers know fiber like some people know wood or stone. That’s art!

  5. Whew! I think I can cope with size 1 needles! 😛 I brought the pattern with me on my east coast visit, but tiny people prevent my planned trip to the yarn store. That’s okay, because you can get me started when you finally meander back to CO!

  6. The booklet looks great, and will be wonderful if it’s half as good as Priscilla’s other books. Pity about the .pdf though, it’s much easier when you’re ordering from the UK. But I can understand the problems….

  7. Kris, this pattern is EXTREMELY flexible and can be worked in any yarn you want. A sportweight on larger-than-1 needles would be great. TOO thick (like worsted) and you’d want a regular, instead of split/tabi, toe construction.

  8. Thanks, Susan. Spent last evening with a friend of similar inclinations analyzing some amazing textiles. I want to blog about them, and wish I knew how to take photographs through a magnifier (maybe 25x). WOW, did we discover interesting things when we got up really close! (with the help of lenses).

  9. We can arrange to get a PDF to you in the UK. The trick is the “immediate download from the web” part.

  10. AnneMarie

    Sometime I should bring my camera over and we could play with taking pictures up close/with magnification. It does amazing macro (I can get as close as my light source allows (within mm-s) of the object.)

    Your blog is facinating 🙂

  11. You need a camera that hooks up to a dissecting microscope…. Or someone to advise you in scientific photography! I bet there’s a scientific photo lab at CSU.

  12. Well, duh. I need to get in touch with the textiles department at CSU about some donations I want to make (some things that I am not the best custodian for). They have recently revamped their costume department. I have a contact there. I’ve just expanded what I want to talk with her about.

    Of course, this is a *side trip* for me, and I have a book deadline. . . .

    But this lace is truly exceptional.

  13. Ohh, cool! Within millimeters should do it.

    There are a few things on this that I almost can’t see with my eyes alone, and yes, it’s handmade. I thought there were some commercial components (a standard way to do some types of laces, and there are several types of lace construction in this complex combination) until I put the big eye on it. EEK! NOT commercial.

  14. I figured you’d have a contact there. Textile departments often have microscope capacity, and I bet they need to photograph textiles under microscopes sometimes. Archeologists and anthropologists who do fibers often have that capability too.

  15. I know about the archaeologists and anthropologists who do textile examination . . . I even know who and where they are (although I’m not about to send off my textile if I don’t have to). I just haven’t had in my possession anything this mind-boggling that gave me a reason to think in these terms!

  16. It’s cool that you have a piece of textile that is that exciting!

  17. It is THRILLING. I drove today wondering if I’d been deceiving myself about it. But both Stephenie and I together, with a bunch of significant experience between us, could not be deceiving ourselves to that extent. . . . I have not had it out of the box I packed it in again. I’m home. I’m waiting until I get other stuff settled, bills paid, and so on. . . .

  18. Cool! I’ll look forward to more of the story as you find the technology….

Leave a Reply