OR-WA

posted in: Travel | 3

All these photos come from several days ago, but connectivity has been iffy where we are now.

We drove into parts of the continent where there are trees, and then also visible water:

Webwatertree_1271

My daughter took a photo of what she considered an unusual load, and it struck me that because of where and when I grew up a pile of hay on a semi looks totally normal . . . all a matter of experience and perspective:

Webhaytruck_1274

I did notice that between trucks and trains, a lot of raw materials were moving around along the Columbia River corridor. The tracks parallel the highway, and there were a lot of cars piled with lumber on this train:

Webtrainlumber_1278

The farther west we got, the more green our surroundings became. The contrast with the parts of Utah and Idaho that we passed through is astonishing:

Weblandscapew_1299

 

We ended up crossing some coastal mountains on a winding, two-lane highway. It was beautiful, but if I’d know the navigator (in the right-hand seat) was going to send us this way, I would have filled the gas tank before we turned off the main road. We made it to the other side and stopped at the first station we saw. It was a gorgeous digression from the limited access roads. Well, limited access in a different way than this. . . .

Webhwy262_1301

Some of us still found the travel boring. . . .

Webdogs_1291

When we came to the bridge across the Columbia River at Astoria, Oregon, I was struck by what astonishing engineering feats structures like these are.

Webastoriabridge1_1305

Coming from the south toward the north, the first part of the bridge (above) is elevated to let ships pass through. The second part is lower, like the Hood Canal Bridge, which I used to cross frequently when I lived on the Olympic Peninsula  (its official name isn’t Hood Canal Bridge, but I’d never heard it called anything else until I just looked it up).

Webastoriabridge2_1306

There’s a different view of the Astoria bridge here.  According to Wikipedia, the bridge is 4.1 miles (6.5 km) long, and is the longest continuous truss bridge in North America. It was also the final piece of coastal highway 101 to be constructed, started in 1962 and completed in 1966.

After I’d moved from the area, the Hood Canal Bridge was broken by a storm. Ferries replaced it (and ferries crossed the stretch of the Columbia, above, from 1926 until the Astoria-Megler bridge was built). That bridge was a different structural type, was subjected to sustained storm winds of 85 mph with gusts of 120 mph, and took a long time to replace. The Astoria bridge was built to withstand winds of 150 mph.

Things like this make me think of what humans are capable of on a grand scale . . . some good, some bad. ("If we can put a man on the moon" is the usual comparison, but that doesn’t have the same effect for me as a big bridge.)

I normally focus on small-scale capacities that build to become larger projects: the simple twisting together of fibers that can then be turned to so many uses, like shelter, clothing, and increased ability to obtain food. When I see mammoth projects like this, I wonder why we aren’t putting similar ingenuity and vision to work to solve problems like energy use, hunger, and war.

If people can build things like these bridges (even when they sometimes may need to be rebuilt), and it’s obvious that we can, we really can do amazing things. We do need to be able to perceive that the problems can be solved, the determination to persist with idea-generation until we come up with solutions that won’t harm the environment (which many past projects didn’t take into account adequately), leadership to coordinate the work, and the ability to muster the resources.

Facebooktwitterrss

3 Responses

  1. Donna Druchunas

    Great post. You wouldn’t believe what stuff needs to be done in Lithuania. I was talking to a guy in my class from Spain, and he said Spain was really poor and just like Lithuania is now about 20 years ago, but the EU dumped money into the economy like there was no tomorrow and the entire country turned around. Now they are dumping money into Lithuania and other new EU nations and I hope the results are the same. There’s no attitude of investment in infrastructure or the future in America. Everyone has bought into the Republican frame of seeing taxes as a burden. And these giant projects need to be done on a communal level, they can’t be done by individuals or private enterprises because they need to belong to everyone. It’s sad that we have such a selfish attitude. I’ve been wondering if it’s part of the way we think because of our language. I’ve noticed that English (and German to some extent) are much more “me” focused languages than other languages i know something about. In Lithuanian you don’t say “I have” very much, you just say “there is” and many verbs are naturally passive, they happen to you, you don’t instigate the action. It’s a very different way of perceiving the world and I’ve got to wonder how the nature of our language changes the way we view and interact with politics. Especially in America where very few people speak any language besides English. Anyway, that’s too long but thanks for the food for thought.

  2. Dina

    Stunning photos and even better scenery. I SO wish I were there this minute! Enjoy your vacation. It is well-deserved, I know!

  3. Joanne

    Ohh, I too am always impressed by bridges and landscapes. It seems like this vacation is a great break–very good stretch for the mind, these breaks! I do think Donna has a point about communal investments…other countries are making them. (I know Canada is.) The US has to make some of these soon, our infrastructure is falling to pieces!

Leave a Reply